Ding_U's Xanga SiteMy thoughts
ding_u
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Interests: Evolution Evolution Evolution...
Expertise: Nothing but procrastinating.
Industry: Education/Research


Message: message me


Member Since: 11/9/2003

SubscriptionsSites I Read

Blogrings
Secular Humanism
previous - random - next

*-philosophy-*
previous - random - next

EVERYTHING INSULTS MY INTELLIGENCE!
previous - random - next

Agnosticism
previous - random - next

I Think I Think too Much
previous - random - next

STMGSS
previous - random - next

!~!~! I'm Atheist !~!~!
previous - random - next

*~PiAnO LoVe~*
previous - random - next

***We Are "STMGSS" Guyz!!!***
previous - random - next


Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site

Saturday, June 23, 2007

Are we the greatest species?

Many of us believe that we're the greatest species that have ever existed. How can we not be? Look at the amazing qualities we have - the use of language, the fashioning of tools, an exceptionally large brain, the capacity of love and friendship, and most impressive of all, the ability to think, reason, and imagine. We are the only species that possesses all these wonderful abilities. Of course we're the greatest.

Displayed by this kind of thinking is a breathtaking self-importance, stemming from narrow-mindedness and fueled by a complete ignorance of Nature, of which we're only a part.

The only reason we appreciate all the amazing qualities in humans is that we are humans. Most of these qualities, when looked at from the point of view of other species, are useless at best. For instance, our natural tendency to appreciate friendship and to behave altruistically towards others would prove dangerous or even fatal to a solitary animal; similarly, our ability to think and reason would mean nothing to a single-celled organism, whose livelihood involves nothing more than a series of chemical reactions at the microscopic level.

If a fly were to have a mental capacity comparable to ours, he would probably consider his compound eyesight the greatest ability in the living world - thousands of tiny eyes are packed in one, arranged in a way so that things could be seen from virtually all angles, allowing their owners to spot food and escape from swatters. Not many species have eyes this impressive, the fly would say. And the transformation of corpse-eating maggots into flying adults, needless to say, must be the greatest wonder in the natural world.

He would think further that since his own species is so great, the world must have been created by an omnipotent god-fly, who made every fly in its own image. He would imagine that this god-fly has the body of a fly, though perfected in all respects. And if there is an otherworldly paradise in this fly's theology, we know it is not going to be the kind of place we humans would find amiable: there wouldn't be eternal love and happiness as we understand it; nor would you find 72 pretty virgins lining up to have sex with you. Instead it would be a land of stinking shit and rotten bodies, which, needless to say, flies would be ecstatic about.

What are we going to say to him, if we ever have the opportunity to meet this theologically-minded fly and engage him in a philosophical discussion? We'll probably say something like this. What you show in your dipterocentric worldview is sheer ignorance and a lack of sense of proportion. You believe in all that simply because you look at the world only from a fly's perspective. The fact is, the world does not revolve around you. What you should do is stop the smugness, open your eyes, and see the world as it is.

Well, perhaps so should we.

PS: pardon my drunken ranting.

 


Sunday, March 25, 2007

星期六晚,吃飽晚飯,無 party 無酒飲,無所事事,突然想起這裡。

時間過得真快,轉眼就差不多一年沒有 update 了。

這裡寫的,還有人看到嗎?

這段日子,發生的事真多。

經歷多很多,人也見得很多。但自己有長大了嗎?

老問題仍在,新問題卻越來越多。

方向找到了嗎? 一點點吧。現在可說是有個模糊的方向,但還未知確實要怎樣走這條路。

自信,恒心,毅力,我相信還是有的。

人生太短了。要做自己喜歡做,和做得好的事。

由朝到晚坐在 office 等上位搏升職 "不是我杯茶"。

努力吧。

 


Friday, April 28, 2006

An extract from Bertrand Russell's famous little book What I believe.

 

"The philosophy of nature is one thing, the philosophy of value is quite another. Nothing but harm can come of confusing them. What we think good, what we should like, has no bearing whatever upon what is, which is the question for the philosophy of nature. On the other hand, we cannot be forbidden to value this or that on the ground that the nonhuman world does not value it, nor can we be compelled to admire anything because it is a law of nature.Undoubtedly we are part of nature, which has produced our desires, our hopes and fears, in accordance with laws which the physicist is beginning to discover. In this sense we are part of nature; in the philosophy of nature we are subordinated to nature, the outcome of natural laws, and their victims in the long run.

 

"The philosophy of nature must not be unduly terrestrial; for it, the earth is merely one of the smaller planets of one of the smaller stars of the Milky Way. It would be ridiculous to warp the philosophy of nature in order to bring out results that are pleasing to the tiny parasites of this insignificant planet. Vitalism as a philosophy, and evolutionism, show, in this respect, a lack of sense of proportion and logical relevance. They regard the facts of life, which are personally interesting to us, as having a cosmic significance, not a significance confined to the earth's surface. Optimism and pessimism, as cosmic philosophies, show the same naive humanism; the great world, so far as we know it from the philosophy of nature, is neither good nor bad, and is not  concerned to make us happy or unhappy. All such philosophies spring from self-importance and are best corrected by a little astronomy.

 

"But in the philosophy of value the situation is reversed. Nature is only a part of what we can imagine; everything, real or imagined, can be appraised by us, and there is no outside standard to show that our valuation is wrong. We are ourselves the ultimate and irrefutable arbiters of value, and in the world of value nature is only a part. Thus in this world we are greater than nature. In the world of values, nature in itself is neutral, neither good nor bad, deserving of neither admiration nor censure. It is we who create value and our desires which confer value. In this realm we are kings, and we debase our kingship if we bow down to nature. It is for us to determine the good life, not for nature - not even for nature personified as God."

 


Friday, April 21, 2006

wow it's been so long since I updated last time. . .

 


Wednesday, November 16, 2005

Respect is what you gain, not what you demand.

 



Next 5 >>